Chrissy Teigen receives death threats, quits Twitter over Ottawa shooting tweet

Chrissy Teigen

Here’s a photo of Chrissy Teigen last night at the FGI Night of Stars event in NYC. She looked gorgeous in hot pink; she won’t be tweeting about the evening after the abuse she’s suffered on Twitter. Chrissy isn’t a stranger to controversy on Twitter. She loves to troll the trolls, and she’s very skilled at throwing shade back in their faces. Is that a skill? Sure it is. Some people find Chrissy abrasive, but she’s fun to follow. She’s definitely not the typical stuck-up, showbiz kind of tweeter. She engages with people and “follows back” a lot more than other celebrities. Plus she mostly tweets mundane things instead of simply pushing a PR agenda.

Chrissy’s tenure on Twitter took a turn for the worse when she made an innocuous comment on Wednesday after the Ottawa shootings. She wasn’t commenting upon the incident itself or on Canada. Chrissy’s comment, “active shooting in Canada, or as we call it in america, wednesday,” was a remark on US gun culture. The tweet was misinterpreted by many, and the fallout has been severe. For over 24 hours, Chrissy received death threats and other abuse. Here’s an abbreviated version of what happened:

(1) Active shooting in Canada, or as we call it in america, wednesday

(2) That’s not a joke. It is a fact.

(3) Sorry you don’t understand that is a knock at america and our issues with gun control. No one is minimizing the Ottawa shooting.

(4) I’m not apologizing. If you take it wrong, that is your fault.

(5) For some reason, Canadians think I am saying they have a lot of shootings. I am not saying that. Sigh.

(6) I’ve lost faith in this world. Sorry if it comes off as being unemotional. There is just so much bad.

(7) 90% of my mentions. RT “you should probably stick to having your picture taken for a living.”

(8) And this is where @twitter needs to step their game up. RT “You f—ing c—. You’ll get yours soon enough.” RT “Wish ISIS would give Chrissy a permanent haircut.”

(9) Yikes. RT “So, how much of an stupid bitch are you?”

(10) my timeline is a nice mix of toast talk and death threats

(11) I can’t see anything through the sea of hate and anger that is now my Twitter. Seriously I can’t sift through it all.

(12) It’s gotten to the point people don’t even see he simplicity of the original tweet and have just wanted to get shaking-mad over something

(13) Amazing this isn’t punishable. RT “@f—— I hope someone murders some you love, like your f—– husband”

(14) I feel sick. Bye Twitter. Taking my talents to instagram.

[From Chrissy Teigen on Twitter]

I don’t blame Chrissy for taking a step back from Twitter. Hopefully, she hasn’t quit for good. She needs a break, and Twitter needs to take these threats seriously. They allow abuse like this to happen all the time. I’ve had friends report similar threats, and Twitter acts like it isn’t their problem until enough people report a certain user. That’s a major issue. All it takes is one crazy person to carry out a threat.

Forbes says that Twitter generates over $1 billion in ad revenue per year. They should have no problem devoting the funds to investigate abusive tweets like this. If it takes celebrities quitting Twitter to spur them into action, so be it.

Chrissy Teigen

Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet & WENN

FFN_GG_NightOfStars_102314_51566246
FFN_GG_NightOfStars_102314_51566250
wenn21737431
wenn21817675

Originally posted here:
Chrissy Teigen receives death threats, quits Twitter over Ottawa shooting tweet

Share

LeAnn Rimes created a Halloween-themed tour promo video: sad or funny?

FFN_Rimes_LeAnn_VAHBJJ_091314_51530099

As we all know, LeAnn Rimes is releasing a “Christmas EP” of six yodeling Christmas songs which few people really want to hear. I tend to think this is a desperate cling to any kind of musical relevancy since her last three albums have flopped and every time LeAnn has to promote anything, it always becomes a carnival of delusion and lies. Not only is LeAnn going to promote the hell out of this sad EP, she’s also going to do a Christmas tour. She’s been trying to hype this tour for months now – back in July, she released a video announcement of the tour which basically involved LeAnn strutting around the beach in a bikini. Go here to remember the stupidity. Well, now LeAnn has released Part II of the… video announcement of her tour. Basically, thirsty chica is thirsty. You should only watch this is you don’t mind cringing for a full three minutes.

The first 20 seconds, I swear it was going to turn into a budget p0rn. Like, that’s a Halloween-themed p0rn set-up. Scantily-clad blonde passing out candy. And then she would need to call the candyman to help her find some “extra candy” or something. As for the scantily-clad blonde… she’s a unicorn, get it? What IS the deal with LeAnn and unicorns? She’s been making unicorn references for months now and I still don’t understand the metaphor. As for the rest of it… God, did she spend all of $20 on the production? And thinking about Christmas in the middle of the Halloween season is just depressing. Last thing: LeAnn is a God-awful actress. Like, really terrible.

leann1

Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet, LeAnn’s Twitter.

FFN_Rimes_LeAnn_VAHBJJ_091314_51530099
FFN_Rimes_LeAnn_VAHBJJ_091314_51530105
leann1

Read more:
LeAnn Rimes created a Halloween-themed tour promo video: sad or funny?

Share

Khloe Kardashian Dresses as Minnie Mouse: See the Cute Pic!

Khloe Kardashian likes to get dressed up.

Remember that photo of Khloe wearing a pig’s mask and standing near an inflatable donut? It’s a difficult image to forget.

The reality star’s latest costume, meanwhile, comes courtesy of sister Kourtney Kardashian, who recently returned from Disneyland on a mission.

“Trying to get make my family as Disney obsessed as I am. #itsWorking #disneyGifts,” Kourtney wrote as a caption to the following photograph.

Khloe Kardashian as Minnie Mouse

Viewers, meanwhile, will be seeing plenty more antics between Khloe and Kourtney on the upcoming E! series Kourtney & Khloe Take The Hamptons.

It premieres on Sunday, November 2 at 9/8c and you can – nay, you should! – check out a preview right here and now:

What sort of scripted shenanigans will take place on this spinoff? Expect to see a lot of French Montana, even though he and Khloe have now split.

And expect to see a lot of Kourtney fighting with Scott Disick because, well… Kourtney is always fighting with Scott Disick. The guy is sort of a huge douchebag.

For more fun with Khloe on Instagram, meanwhile, toggle through this gallery of photo:

Khloe Kardashian Cleavage Pic


Hello, Khloe Kardashian cleavage! The reality star posted this photo to Instagram.

Originally posted here:
Khloe Kardashian Dresses as Minnie Mouse: See the Cute Pic!

Share

Madison Louch Blackmailed Over Nude iCloud Photos, Jamie Munoz Arrested in Sting!

Madison Louch, a young, smoking hot South African model, was recently contacted by a blackmailer over hacked nude photos stolen from her iCloud.

The message: Pay up or the naked pics go public!

Her response: Call the cops and flip the script!

  • Madison Louch Bikini Photo
  • Madison Louch Pic

Madison Louch was locked out of her Cloud back on September 7 before she got a call from some guy who bragged that he had just hacked her account.

He told her he is “notorious” for hacking into the accounts of stars and posting hacked nude celebrity photos online, then he made his demand:

Pay $900 or he’d “ruin her modeling career.” 

Yes, a relatively modest $900 was all he asked for … placed in a brown Trader Joe’s bag in a planter located at a building on Fairfax Ave. in Hollywood, Calif.

Louch called the LAPD, who put the money there and then kept undercover eyes on the bag, swarming the woman who came to pick up the package.

Jamie Munoz said she was merely a pawn, picking up the money for someone who was threatening to post nude photos, but not personally involved.

Nicholas Douglas from Vancouver, she said, was the person behind the extortion plot. Police are still investigating that lead, but Munoz was still arrested.

She ended up pleading guilty to attempted extortion and got three years probation and community service. Douglas, if that’s his real name, is still at large.

Mara Teigen


Mara is a California-based model (of course). She’s not related to Chrissy Teigen, so it would be totally kosher for them to make out.

While Kate Upton and Jennifer Lawrence nude photos got most of the attention from The Fappening, countless other stars and models were hacked.

Just when you think the scandal is dead, more photos leak.

As we saw with Joy Corrigan and countless other models, there’s really no need to extort anyone when you can simply gaze at their public profiles.

Seriously. Instagram is the best thing ever.

Read the original post:
Madison Louch Blackmailed Over Nude iCloud Photos, Jamie Munoz Arrested in Sting!

Share

Blake Lively’s alleged cravings: ‘organic pumpkin ice cream & small-batch pickles’

FFN_Lively_Blake_TEACH_101714_51561199

Here are some photos of Blake Lively out and about in NYC on Friday. She stopped by Giggle, which I guess is some sort of baby-accoutrement shop, and she signed up for their baby registry. Crap, we have to buy her baby stuff for her?! Damn it, Blake! She also checked out Boffi, a “high end bath and kitchen design store,” according to Fame/Flynet. She tried out a new bathtub. As for her shopping outfit… well, it’s not my jam but whatever she wants. That coat is really loud and her skirt is really short. While on the red carpet on Thursday night, Blake already joked: “I’m gonna amp up my style by wearing things that are stretchier.” Because she’s knocked up, get it? There’s also this funny (but probably not true) story about Blake’s cravings:

It seems those insatiable midnight cravings are getting the better of pregnant Blake Lively, who sends Ryan Reynolds out to get her PUMPKIN ice cream at midnight. The expectant actress has reportedly been keeping her hubby busy with endless requests for bizarre food.

They include hand-churned pumpkin-flavoured ice cream and pickles. Gross. A source told Heat magazine: “She sends Ryan out in the middle of the night for organic hand-churched pumpkin-flavoured ice cream and small-batch pickles. He barely has five hours’ sleep and even when he gets in bed, she asks for hour-long foot and neck massages.”

[From The Mirror]

If I found a dude willing to give hour-long neck massages, I would lock that sh-t down so fast it would make your head spin. It could be the grossest guy in the world, the dong situation could be completely tragic, but if there were hour-long neck rubs involved, I would force him into a marriage of convenience/neck-rubs. As for the organic, hand-churned pumpkin ice cream and “small batch pickles”… that sounds true but it probably isn’t. Who knows though? I could totally see Blake becoming one of those donut-shaming pregnant women. She seems like the type to side-eye anyone who would dare to eat Vlasic Pickles straight from the jar.

Meanwhile, CB sent me Blake’s latest word salad from Preserve. You can read it here and if you can explain what the hell Blake is talking about, God bless you. I think she’s trying to address the “Allure of Antebellum” situation. I think she’s trying to say that she knows she’s not perfect and she’s doing the best she can and that Preserve is about all of us so if we criticize her for being ignorant, we’re really criticizing ourselves. You know what I think is really interesting? Every time Blake sits down and writes one of her stupid word salads, more people lose respect for her. She used to be widely admired for brilliantly playing the Hollywood game. Now we’re like “Eh, she’s kind of dumb, right?”

FFN_Lively_Blake_TEACH_101714_51561204

FFN_Lively_Blake_TEACH_101714_51561203

Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.

FFN_Lively_Blake_TEACH_101714_51561196
FFN_Lively_Blake_TEACH_101714_51561197
FFN_Lively_Blake_TEACH_101714_51561199
FFN_Lively_Blake_TEACH_101714_51561201
FFN_Lively_Blake_TEACH_101714_51561203
FFN_Lively_Blake_TEACH_101714_51561204

See the original post:
Blake Lively’s alleged cravings: ‘organic pumpkin ice cream & small-batch pickles’

Share

John Grisham Apologizes For Suggesting Child Porn Offenders Deserve Lesser Punishments

Best-selling author John Grisham is under fire today for remarks in which he implied that some child sex offenders face punishments that too harsh.

He’s now backtracking as fast as humanly possible.

Grisham

In a wide-ranging interview on the U.S. judicial system with The Telegraph (UK), Grisham said judges have “gone crazy” over the past 30 years.

By this he means that they’re locking up too many people, from white collar criminals to minorities on minor drug charges, and even those who view child porn.

“We have prisons now filled with guys my age. Sixty-year-old white men in prison who’ve never harmed anybody, would never touch a child,” he said.

“But they got online one night and started surfing around, probably had too much to drink or whatever, pushed the wrong buttons, went too far and got into child porn.”

Grisham, who is promoting his new book Gray Mountain, added, “These people haven’t hurt anybody. They deserve some punishment, but 10 years in prison?”

He went on to share the story of a friend from law school who was caught in a “sting” operation and served time in prison for downloading child pornography.

“His drinking was out of control, and he went to a website. It was labeled ’16-year-old wannabe hookers’ or something like that’ … So he went there.”

“Downloaded some stuff … it was 16-year-old girls who looked 30. He shouldn’t have done it. It was stupid, but it wasn’t 10-year-old boys.”

“He didn’t touch anything. And, God, a week later there was a knock on the door.”

“‘FBI!’ [It was all a sting] set up by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police to catch people – sex offenders – and he went away to prison for three years.”

“I have no sympathy for real pedophiles,” he added, “God, please lock those people up. But so many of these guys do not deserve harsh prison sentences.”

After the obligatory backlash hit, Grisham said in a statement:

“Anyone who harms a child for profit or pleasure, or who in any way participates in child pornography – online or otherwise – should be punished to the fullest extent of the law.”

“My comments… were in no way intended to show sympathy for those convicted of sex crimes, especially the sexual molestation of children.”

“I can think of nothing more despicable,” the novelist added, and concluded, “I regret having made these comments, and apologize to all.”

While Grisham’s words might have been poorly chosen and timed, this sounds more like a broader commentary on the penal system than, say, Stephen Collins.

Read the rest here:
John Grisham Apologizes For Suggesting Child Porn Offenders Deserve Lesser Punishments

Share

John Grisham: Old white guys looking at child p0rn shouldn’t be locked up

wenn1219407

I’ve only seen a handful of John Grisham’s TV interviews – like, Charlie Rose and The Daily Show – and he always struck me as a quiet, thoughtful, interesting man. Grisham is a bestselling author of like a bajillion books and at this point, he really doesn’t have to get out there and hustle on crazy book tours. And he might want to consider his policy on interviews too, because Grisham just gave an interview to The Telegraph which is, at best, stupidly controversial and at worst, wildly offensive. Grisham went off and started complaining about all of the men locked up for looking at child p0rn. You can read the full piece here, and here’s what he said:

“We have prisons now filled with guys my age. Sixty-year-old white men in prison who’ve never harmed anybody, would never touch a child. But they got online one night and started surfing around, probably had too much to drink or whatever, and pushed the wrong buttons, went too far and got into child porn.” In a final rearguard action, Grisham added, “I have no sympathy for real paedophiles. God, please lock those people up. But so many of these guys do not deserve harsh prison sentences, and that’s what they’re getting.”

Grisham cites the case of a “law school buddy” whose porn consumption led to three years in jail.

“His drinking was out of control, and he went to a website,” he says. ”It was labelled 16-year-old wannabee hookers or something like that’. So he went there. Downloaded some stuff – it was 16 year old girls who looked 30. He shouldn’t ’a done it. It was stupid, but it wasn’t 10-year-old boys. He didn’t touch anything. And God, a week later there was a knock on the door: FBI”.

[From The Telegraph]

If he had framed his argument in a different way – like, the prevalence of p0rn in our culture, the sexualization of teenage girls – I might be more sympathetic. But it sounds like Grisham is lamenting the fact that a couple of his friends are locked up because they were looking at child p0rn online. I don’t care if you’re drunk and/or stupid, it’s still a crime. And I have a HUGE side-eye for this statement: “it was 16 year old girls who looked 30… It was stupid, but it wasn’t 10-year-old boys.” Ah, so “looking at 10 year old boys” is less acceptable to John Grisham than “looking at 16 year old girls.” Because teenage girls deserve to be exploited but not the boys?

UPDATE: Here’s Grisham’s apology:

Anyone who harms a child for profit or pleasure, or who in any way participates in child pornography—online or otherwise—should be punished to the fullest extent of the law.

My comments made two days ago during an interview with the British newspaper The Telegraph were in no way intended to show sympathy for those convicted of sex crimes, especially the sexual molestation of children. I can think of nothing more despicable.

I regret having made these comments, and apologize to all.

Well, at least he apologized. Eh.

wenn20778749

Photos courtesy of WENN.

wenn1219407
wenn2866177
wenn20778749

Continue reading here:
John Grisham: Old white guys looking at child p0rn shouldn’t be locked up

Share

Khloe Kardashian Laughs Off Lionel Richie Paternity Rumor: I’ve Had So Many Dads …

Khloe Kardashian is laughing off the most recent tabloid story regarding who her real father is, saying she’s almost lost count of her number of fathers.

The latest? Lionel Richie is her real father, a rumor she obviously denies.

Khloe tells Gossip Cop, “I’ve had so many dads my head is spinning lol.”

  • Khloe Kardashian Tabloid Rumor
  • Khloe Kardashian Tabloid Kover

At least she has a sense of humor about it, even if she’s half serious. At least three people, by our count, have been falsely pegged in the role of late.

This has, ridiculously, been a recurring theme over at In Touch, which makes the subject of Khloe’s paternity a surprisingly regular topic of discussion.

While we all love good celebrity gossip, there’s something inherently desperate about making things up out of thin air, then recycling them over and over to boot.

In early 2013, Alex Roldan was rumored to be Khloe’s biological father, an allegation the Keeping Up With the Kardashians star decried as shameless.

Perhaps the most notorious fake Khloe father is O.J. Simpson.

  • OJ as Khloe Kardashian's Father?
  • Khloe Kardashian: Rejected!

Before the aforementioned cited Richie as Kardashian’s dad this week, Simpson’s alleged prison lover said O.J. is Khloe’s father, having slept with Kris Jenner.

O.J.’s friend and confidant Robert Kardashian Sr. divorced Kris, with whom he had four children (yes, including Khloe), in 1991. He passed away in 2003.

Those two at least had some connection. It’s unclear where the tabloid even came up with Richie, but Khloe has cleared it up for us, not that we needed her to.

Consider this paternal mystery solved by Khloe, Gossip Cop and common sense … at least until the next time their editors are lacking for a cover story.

At least Khloe’s siblings can relate to the tabloid nonsense frenzy …

Kim Kardashian Butt Problems


Oh no! Kim Kardashian’s butt won’t stop growing! What will the reality star do?

Read more here:
Khloe Kardashian Laughs Off Lionel Richie Paternity Rumor: I’ve Had So Many Dads …

Share

Blake Lively tried to stop Gawker from making fun of her pro-Antebellum editorial

FFN_CFDA_Awards_NYC_060214_51437961

I wasn’t going to write about this at first, but then it snowballed into a media story and now I sort of have to cover it, which sucks for Blake Lively. In between posting photos of her baby bump and trying to sell us beautiful ginger children, Blake Lively posted this weird editorial/layout/thing on her Preserve site. The editorial/post is called “The Allure of Antebellum.” Antebellum being the pre-Civil War era in the American South. As in, Blake wants to romanticize the era where ladies didn’t have the right to vote and human beings were sold like property. This is what was written in the post:

Georgia peaches, sweet tea, and the enticement of a smooth twang…we all love a bit of southern charm. These regional mainstays, along with an innate sense of social poise, evoke an unparalleled warmth and authenticity in style and tradition.

The term “Southern Belle” came to fruition during the Antebellum period (prior to the Civil War), acknowledging women with an inherent social distinction who set the standards for style and appearance. These women epitomized Southern hospitality with a cultivation of beauty and grace, but even more with a captivating and magnetic sensibility. While at times depicted as coy, these belles of the ball, in actuality could command attention with the ease of a hummingbird relishing a pastoral bloom.

Like the debutantes of yesteryear, the authenticity and allure still ring true today. Hoop skirts are replaced by flared and pleated A-lines; oversized straw toppers are transformed into wide-brimmed floppy hats and wool fedoras.

The prowess of artful layering -the southern way- lies in inadvertent combinations. From menswear-inspired overcoats to the fluidity of soft flowing separates, wrap yourself up in tactile layers that elicit a true sense of seasonal lure.

Embrace the season and the magic below the Mason-Dixon with styles as theatric as a Dixie drawl.

[From Preserve]

Now, do I think Blake meant anything rude, racist or nasty by this? Not at all. I think she’s a white lady who never considered the fact that she was romanticizing a period of time that many Americans consider to be part of the darkest in our history. Like, she’s seen Gone with the Wind 20 times and she’s never watched 12 Years A Slave.

I didn’t even care that much about the story/controversy because I thought it was about historical ignorance more than any conscious choice to align herself with the Confederacy. But then Blake made an even stupider mistake. Gawker had written a harsh critique of Blake’s “Allure of Antebellum” post and Blake’s lawyers sent a take-down notice to Gawker – see here. She was trying to shut down criticism of her stupid pro-Antebellum editorial. Is this just a rookie mistake? Because whenever I try to look through Preserve, I’m always struck by how disorganized it is, so much so I can’t even concentrate on the “message.” Maybe she should focus more on making Preserve more user-friendly?

FFN_CFDA_Awards_NYC_060214_51437958

Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.

FFN_CFDA_Awards_NYC_060214_51437958
FFN_CFDA_Awards_NYC_060214_51437961

See the original post:
Blake Lively tried to stop Gawker from making fun of her pro-Antebellum editorial

Share

Benedict Cumberbatch steps out in London, talks about Alan Turing’s sexuality

cumberbatch tree

First off, Vanity Fair has a nice little mini-pictorial/spotlight on Benedict Cumberbatch and Eddie Redmayne in the Jennifer Lawrence issue. Eddie got two photos (including one with a basket full of puppies) while Benedict just got one photo – Benedict looking brooding and sexy in a tree. As one does. I have to say, if I came upon an alien-otter in a tree, I might freak out a little bit and not in a good way. Benedict was also out in London with Keira Knightley and Keira’s husband on Saturday night. I’m including some of those photos at the end of the post. A blonde woman is behind Benedict but I’m almost positive that’s his publicist. No secret girlfriend, eh? (Yes, I’m trolling.)

Meanwhile, Benedict has a lovely new interview with NME. It’s mostly about Alan Turing and how much Benedict loves all things Turing. You can tell he’s really proud of this film. I’m not sure how much you want me to discuss Benedict’s quotes about Turing? While I find Turing fascinating and I’m half in love with Benedict, the combination of Benedict talking about Turing is oddly anticlimactic. So you can read the full piece here and here are some highlights that I found interesting:

Benedict on the awards season buzz: “If it gets people to see the film, frankly, that is all I care about. It’s early days and very flattering of course but there are a lot of other extraordinary films and performances people haven’t seen yet. But if it creates an interest for people to see what all the fuss is about then that’s fantastic because our jobs as storytellers are made easier if there’s an audience. And more importantly for me, having had some experience with this man I really want his story to be known and our film to be a launching point for a proper celebration of Alan Turing.”

The comparisons of Sherlock and Alan Turing: “Well, I’m limited by who I am and what I look like but at the same time they’re utterly different people. Alan doesn’t swish around in a long coat with curly hair demonstrating how brilliant he is… He’s a very quiet, stoic, determined and different type of hero. He’s smart but an outsider because of the conditions of his personal life. As far as the similarity that he’s socially awkward… What you see in the film is an evolution in him which is humanising. That happens in some aspects with Sherlock but I didn’t read the script and think, ‘This is Sherlock in tweed’. I liked how uncompromising he was but that’s always a stong trait in strong characters. I have played stupid people as well. I want to point that out. So if anybody’s got any more stupid roles for me, great, bring ‘em on!”

Approaching Turing’s homosexuality: “His sexuality is something contained that is expressed in the film but not shown explicitly. There is no heterosexuality expressed in the film. So what we show in his behaviour is sadly true to his story. He had to suppress his sexuality, make it private, make it something secret. When he talks about his sexuality in the film it shows his complete honesty, guilelessness, innocence. He was aware of the risks but at the same time wasn’t willing to cave in to the intolerance and potential permutations of confessing such a thing. Some people own him as martyr or as standard-bearer for a cause. I think he was just very true to himself, which is a form of martyrdom, but he didn’t make a political statement out of it.”

[From NME]

That’s an interesting way of saying it – “There is no heterosexuality expressed in the film.” They can’t make Turing an out-and-proud gay man because he wasn’t, but he didn’t live a blatant lie and Travolta his way through life either. There is no hetero caricature. There is an absence of heterosexuality. That’s fascinating.

Oh, and good news! Benedict is in the new issue of Flaunt Mag. I’ve seen some of the editorial on Tumblr, but I’m not going to cover it until the cover is released.

Here are some photos of Benedict out in London Saturday night. I can’t help it, you guys. I loathe his haircut.

FFN_FlyUK_CelebsMayfair_101114_51555203

FFN_FlyUK_CelebsMayfair_101114_51555205

Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet and Vanity Fair.

cumberbatch tree
FFN_FlyUK_CelebsMayfair_101114_51555202
FFN_FlyUK_CelebsMayfair_101114_51555203
FFN_FlyUK_CelebsMayfair_101114_51555204
FFN_FlyUK_CelebsMayfair_101114_51555205
FFN_FlyUK_CelebsMayfair_101114_51555206

Read more from the original source:
Benedict Cumberbatch steps out in London, talks about Alan Turing’s sexuality

Share